Party Dismissed in One Claim Add Again Amended Complaint

Activists are charging Britain officials and the globe's most powerful health figures like Nib Gates and Dr Fauci with crimes against humanity and genocide, citing a range of statistics on the furnishings of COVID "vaccines" and policies.

Bill Gates, Dr Fauci And Big Pharma Accused Of Crimes Against Humanity In Complaint To International Court

One group including Dr. Michael Yeadon, one-time Vice President of Pfizer, filed a complaint (read below) representing British citizens in the International Criminal Courtroom (ICC) against the likes of Boris Johnson and British officials, Nib and Melinda Gates, directors of large pharmaceutical companies, World Economical Forum executive chairman Klaus Schwab, and others charging them with crimes against humanity.

The group based in the Great britain, which includes an astrophysicist and a funeral director amongst their ranks, also charged Dr. Anthony Fauci; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-full general of the World Health Organization (WHO); June Raine, master executive of Medicines and Healthcare products regulatory agency (MHRA); Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, equally "responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code … war crimes and crimes of assailment" in the Britain and several other countries.

After repeating their unsuccessful try to bring their case to a UK courtroom, the petitioners started calling with "the utmost urgency" for the ICC "to cease the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare … being waged against the people of the UK."

Among the grouping's complaint filed on the 6th of December, they provide evidence that the "vaccines" were in fact zero but cistron therapies that were a production of engineering with proceeds-of-role enquiry from bat coronaviruses. They further argued that these "vaccines" have resulted in widespread death and injury, only the U.k. government had failed in investigating these cases of reported deaths and injuries.

Several other arguments made by them included the claim that the COVID statistics including the death numbers were inflated; the face masks posed several risks such every bit hypoxia, hypercapnia and other causes; and that the PCR tests were "completely unreliable" and "contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide."

Additionally, they argued that constructive treatments for Covid-xix including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were suppressed and resulted in more than COVID-xix mortality than there should have been.

They claim the lockdowns were created on the pretext of artificially inflated infections and deaths from a genetically engineered virus, as well as experimental "vaccines" that led to the following results:

Serious short-term injuries and deaths with at least 395,049 extreme side furnishings reported from COVID "vaccines" in the UK lone; abrupt increase in calls into ChildLine from vulnerable children during lockdowns; "devastation of wealth and businesses" through imposed lockdowns;" "severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international police," which contained travel bans and bans on gathering, and compelled quarantine and self-isolation; the segregation alike to apartheid due to implementation of the vaccine passport organisation; and "expected reduction in fertility" postal service "vaccination," amid various other detrimental physical and psychological effects.

Additionally, the applicants are adamant on their merits that "the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-nineteen amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court."

They found that in add-on to censoring and promoting information well-nigh these alternative treatments on the internet, "some academic journals are blocking the publication of studies showing the effectiveness of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine."

Applicants also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who portray "stark parallels between Covid restrictions and the beginning of the Holocaust." In an open alphabetic character addressed to the medical regulatory government, the survivors of Holocaust have asked them to "stop this ungodly medical experiment on humankind immediately," which they affirm is in the violation of the Nuremberg Code.

They even claim that "some other holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes." I of the survivors, Vera Sharav, said in an interview mentioned in the complaint:

"The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever doctors join forces with government and deviate from their personal, professional person, clinical commitment to do no impairment to the individual, medicine tin can and so exist perverted from a healing, humanitarian profession to a murderous appliance."

"What sets the Holocaust autonomously from all other mass genocides is the pivotal function played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. Every pace of the murderous process was endorsed past the academic, professional person medical institution. Medical doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the veneer of legitimacy to infanticide, mass murder of civilians."

According to the lament applicants, all harmful effects of "vaccines", quarantines and viruses meet the criteria of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes against the British people, because of the perpetrators "members of the UK government and world leaders accept both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes."

They fifty-fifty argue that the destructive effects of "vaccines", shutdowns, and engineered viruses are deliberate attempts to reduce population and destabilize social stability as part of a coordinated global program to consolidate wealth and power in the hands of the very few and fortunate.

They go along to engage in the debate that these acts are therefore a "law-breaking of aggression", which is, an endeavour "effectively to do control over or to direct the political or military machine action of a State." In this case, they merits, the goal is to "dismantl[e] all the Autonomous Nation States, step by stride," and to "destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the marketplace shares to the largest corporations," held by the ultra-rich, so as to give this specific "elite" group considerably greater monetary and political control.

Read the court complaint below:

Bill-Gates-Dr-Fauci-And-Large-Pharma-Accused-Of-Crimes-Confronting-Humanity-International-Court

We need your back up to carry on our independent and investigative research based journalism on the Deep State threats facing humanity. Your contribution nonetheless pocket-size helps united states continue afloat. Kindly consider supporting GreatGameIndia.

Support GreatGameIndia

labrecquewhice1982.blogspot.com

Source: https://greatgameindia.com/bill-gates-fauci-crimes-against-humanity/

0 Response to "Party Dismissed in One Claim Add Again Amended Complaint"

Postar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel